A. Setaioli, “Interpretazioni stoiche ed epicuree per Servio e la dottrina dell’esegesi filosofica del saga e dei poeti per Roma (Cornuto, Seneca, Filodemo)”, I–II,International Journal of the Classical Tradition 10, 2003–2004, 335–376; 11, 2004–2005, 3–46.
Verso. Setaioli, “Le fragment II Soubiran duDe consulatu de Ciceron, leDe diuinatione et leur lecture par Virgile”, in:Signe et prediction dans l’Antiquite. Actes du Discussion international interdisciplinaire de Creteil et de Paris (22–23–24 no 2003). Textes reunis par Jose Kany-Turpin, Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Universite de Saint-Etienne 2005, 241–261.
Addirittura. Merli, “Epigrammzyklen und ‘serielle Lekture’ sopra den Buchern Martials: Uberlegungen und Beispiele,” sopra F
W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1952 (reprint: ibid. W. H. Stahl,Macrobius’ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1990).
P. Steinmetz, “Allegorische Deutung und allegorische Dichtung per der alten Stoa”,Rheinisches Museum fur Philologie N.F. 129, 1986, 18–30 (ristampato con: Come sopra, P. Steinmetz,Kleine Schriften, anche. Severin Koster, Palingenesia 68, Stuttgart: Steiner 2000).
References
The ‘conferenceacta’ comprise seven papers that are meant puro document the direction(s) in which the exploration of Roman literature is now moving, or (more accurately perhaps) per the opinion of most of the contributorsshould orshould not be moving; they were published mediante the most recent testo of theTransactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 1–162 (for Edmunds, see 1–13).
Edmunds (above, n. https://datingranking.net/it/meetville-review/ 2):Transactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 8–9 (quotation at 8, the emphasis is mine); I leave it up esatto the reader onesto discover which of the papers is excluded here. Note that Edmunds’ (and, of course, others’) elite notion of ‘interpretation’ is emphatically narrow and must not be put on verso par with its ‘traditional’ sense, “to expound the meaning of [something]; preciso render (words, writings, an author, etc.) clear and explicit; to elucidate; onesto explain” (OED 2 , s.v., 1a).
Exceptions prove the rule. Whatever W.’s predisposition may have been, he surely made verso wise decision when embarking onRoman Homosexuality for his Ph.D. first, andthen turning to a commentary on per collection of poetry.
For a theoretic back-up, cf. D. Fowler, “Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism per the age of the electronic media,” in: G. W. Most (ed.),Commentaries-Kommentare, Aporemata 4 (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999): 426–442 (esp. 429–430).
Other examples of modern scholars, all well-known and highly esteemed forboth their theoryoriented works and their commentaries, include Ed. Fantham (Seneca, Lucan, Ovid), D. Fowler (Lucretius), and R. F. Thomas (Virgil), onesto name but a few.
W., at 283–284, gives verso list of the most important editions and commentaries, onesto which one might want esatto add Per. Canobbio,La lex Roscia theatralis ancora Militare: il successione del analisi V, Scansia di Athenaeum 49 (Como: New Press, 2002), because it is verso valuable supplement preciso P. Howell’s edition of Book 5 (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995), for which seeAnzeiger fur die Altertums-wissenschafter 50 (1997): 17–21. The collection of essays on Book 10, edited by G. Damschen and A. Heil,maton liber decimus: Text Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late sicuro be included in W.’s bibliography.
The bibliography, as emphasized by W. (283), is of course not meant puro be exhaustive; for aForschungsbericht, see S. Lorenz, “]): 167–227, and cf. the bibliography per Damschen-Heil (above, n.7):maton liber decimus: Text, Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late sicuro be included in W.’s bibliography 401–490.
For verso useful assessment of this issue (initiated by K. Barwick), cf. Grewing (ed.),Toto notus per orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Palingenesia 65, (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1998): 139–156.
Leave a Reply